When Quality Breaks Down: How ISO 9001 Could Have Helped Prevent the Waitrose Bottled Water Recall

At the end of December 2025, the Food Standards Agency (FSA) issued an urgent product recall for No.1 Deeside Natural Mineral Water, a brand stocked by Waitrose, one of the UK’s most reputable supermarket chains. The alert concerned both the still and sparkling 750ml glass bottles of the product, which were feared to be contaminated with fragments of glass. This contamination posed a serious physical risk to consumers - with potential for mouth and throat injuries, choking, or even internal cuts if ingested.

The recall notice, shared across national news platforms, affected products with use-by dates stretching to October 2027. This long shelf life meant the bottles were widely distributed and already purchased by thousands of customers. While no injuries had been officially reported at the time of the recall, the risk was considered high enough for Waitrose to ask customers to return the bottles immediately for a full refund and to dispose of them safely.

Investigations quickly turned to the likely root cause: glass fragments believed to have originated during the bottling or capping process. This is a known risk in high-speed bottling operations, particularly when tolerances in machinery become misaligned, or when glass defects aren’t properly screened. The manufacturer, Deeside Water Company, based in Scotland, has not yet released a full technical explanation of the fault - but the presence of glass in sealed bottles strongly suggests a failure in process control, inspection, or supplier material integrity.

This incident also follows a wider trend. According to the FSA and independent risk analysts, product recalls - particularly for physical contamination in food and beverage items - remain significantly elevated compared to pre-2020 levels. Glass, metal, and plastic fragments now account for a large proportion of high-risk recalls. These incidents not only carry direct health implications but also come with reputational damage, legal risks, and financial cost - all of which could have been mitigated through stronger quality management practices.

Where ISO 9001 Fits In

ISO 9001 isn’t just a certification badge. It’s a globally recognised framework for embedding quality into every stage of a company’s operations. From leadership oversight to supplier controls, ISO 9001 sets out how an organisation should anticipate, manage, and continuously improve the quality and safety of its products. In this case, a robust implementation of ISO 9001 may well have prevented the issue - or at the very least, triggered early detection before the products hit retail shelves.

Understanding the Organisational Context (Clause 4)

A bottling company working with glass should, under Clause 4, clearly identify the fragility and breakage risk as a key external and internal issue. Understanding how environmental conditions, staff handling practices, supply chain variability, and machine performance all affect the likelihood of contamination is a critical first step. This also includes mapping all outsourced activities - such as glass bottle supply or cap manufacturing - which can be major sources of hidden risk.

Leadership Commitment (Clause 5)

When leadership fails to invest in regular machine servicing, advanced inspection systems, or detailed training for operators, quality lapses become inevitable. ISO 9001 demands top-level accountability. The board or managing director must show that quality isn’t just a backroom function but part of the company’s strategic direction. An ISO-aligned leadership team would have ensured proactive investment in hazard control.

Planning for Risk (Clause 6)

A key part of ISO 9001 is structured, risk-based planning. For bottled water production, this should include routine failure mode analysis (FMEA), where contamination hazards - including glass - are explicitly scored and controlled. It should also involve contingency planning, such as how defective batches are isolated and recalled.

Clause 6 would also cover the monitoring of near-miss events. If smaller glass defects were noticed during past internal inspections but dismissed as isolated incidents, then the warning signs were there - and ISO 9001 would require such signals to be formally reviewed and acted upon.

Process Control and Inspection (Clause 8)

This clause is likely where the core failure occurred. Clause 8 governs the production processes, verification of outputs, and validation of equipment. In a well-run ISO 9001 system, filling lines would be routinely checked for signs of mechanical stress that could cause glass shattering. Visual inspection systems - automated or manual - would be checked for efficacy.

Moreover, operators should be empowered to stop the line if any abnormality is observed, with escalation routes clearly defined. Traceability of every bottle to a specific production batch would be enabled, helping ensure rapid targeted recall. Failure to detect the contamination until distribution suggests gaps in one or more of these areas.

Evaluating Performance and Acting on Feedback (Clause 9)

ISO 9001 requires data-driven evaluation of product quality and customer satisfaction. This includes analysis of complaints, test results, and process metrics. Had any prior indicators been noticed - such as glass flaws or minor cracking in prior runs - the system would have prompted action before the issue escalated.

This clause also includes the internal audit process, which should be examining production records, calibration schedules, and incident reports. If audits were not being conducted or weren’t effective, opportunities for improvement may have been missed.

Driving Continuous Improvement (Clause 10)

Once an issue is identified, ISO 9001 expects more than just a fix - it demands that the cause be identified, corrective action taken, and verification of effectiveness completed. In the wake of this incident, a certified organisation would undertake a full root cause analysis (RCA), retrain staff, redesign any relevant procedures, and ensure lessons learned are communicated across the team.

This clause turns failures into opportunities to enhance the system. It builds resilience.

The Bigger Picture

Waitrose and Deeside Water Company responded quickly and responsibly to the incident. But the fact remains - the products still made it into customers’ homes. That fact alone reveals a critical breakdown in the quality assurance process. With better controls, more rigorous planning, and stronger leadership oversight, this incident could have been prevented.

ISO 9001 remains one of the most powerful tools available to manufacturers looking to avoid exactly this kind of risk. In an era of increasing scrutiny and regulatory enforcement, applying its principles isn’t just a compliance exercise. It’s an investment in your reputation, your customer relationships, and your operational future.

For manufacturers and suppliers across the UK, this recall should be a wake-up call. Quality failures are no longer private - they’re public, rapid, and potentially devastating. The question isn’t whether you can afford to implement ISO 9001.

The question is whether you can afford not to.

Don't wait any longer. Sign up to a Certification Audit with AAA and take the first step towards achieving ISO 9001 certification.